Friends of Nature is China's oldest national environmental NGO, giving a voice to 'voiceless nature' in the courtroom. In 1993, Liang Congjie—a grandson of Liang Qichao—founded it, and for 30 years since, with over 30,000 registered volunteers and 23 local groups, it has continued law/policy advocacy, public participation and environmental education. At its core is environmental public-interest litigation (EPIL): by the end of 2024 it had led 64 cases, 57 accepted and 47 concluded. The 2011 Qujing chromium-slag case was China's first grassroots EPIL, winning, over ten years, orders for cleanup and compensation on a problem where a state factory's chromium waste polluted farmland and water sources and created a 'cancer village.' The Changzhou 'toxic land' case established the 'polluter-pays principle' and got that provision written into the 2019 Soil Pollution Prevention Law. The Yunnan green peafowl case (2017–22) was China's first preventive EPIL, halting a dam that threatened the last habitat of the endangered green peafowl, recognized by the World Conference on Environmental Justice as one of the 'world's top 10 biodiversity cases.' It has been involved in over 60 environmental laws and submitted over 70 proposals.
●●○ medium
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
Friends of Nature: Giving a voice to voiceless nature through public-interest litigation. The letter is B; certainty is medium. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q3; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ A single story
The endangered green peafowl (Pavo muticus) was about to lose its last habitat to a dam in Yunnan. In 2017, Friends of Nature filed China's first preventive environmental public-interest litigation and won a halt to the dam on grounds of a flawed environmental impact assessment (in 2022). A voiceless species and ecosystem were protected through the court. This case was recognized by the World Conference on Environmental Justice as one of the 'world's top 10 biodiversity cases.' The beneficiary is voiceless nature itself (an endangered species and its ecosystem).
Source nature: Sixth Tone / P2 Independent (Sixth Tone). Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- Founded in 1993, China's first national grassroots environmental NGO. It led 64 EPIL cases by the end of 2024 (57 accepted, 47 concluded). The Qujing chromium-slag case, the Changzhou toxic-land case (polluter-pays principle → 2019 Soil Pollution Prevention Law), the green peafowl case (China's first preventive EPIL; dam halted). Involved in over 60 environmental laws, over 70 proposals, and it has nurtured 3 social enterprises.P1 Independent (company + legal record)
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- C
- h
- i
- n
- a
- '
- s
- s
- t
- r
- u
- c
- t
- u
- r
- a
- l
- N
- G
- O
- /
- j
- u
- d
- i
- c
- i
- a
- l
- c
- o
- n
- s
- t
- r
- a
- i
- n
- t
- s
- (
- r
- e
- g
- i
- s
- t
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- ,
- n
- o
- a
- d
- m
- i
- n
- i
- s
- t
- r
- a
- t
- i
- v
- e
- E
- P
- I
- L
- )
- ;
- d
- e
- l
- a
- y
- e
- d
- e
- n
- f
- o
- r
- c
- e
- m
- e
- n
- t
- o
- f
- j
- u
- d
- g
- m
- e
- n
- t
- s
- a
- n
- d
- e
- f
- f
- e
- c
- t
- i
- v
- e
- l
- y
- d
- r
- a
- w
- n
- c
- a
- s
- e
- s
- ;
- t
- h
- e
- g
- a
- p
- b
- e
- t
- w
- e
- e
- n
- w
- i
- n
- n
- i
- n
- g
- a
- n
- d
- o
- n
- -
- t
- h
- e
- -
- g
- r
- o
- u
- n
- d
- i
- m
- p
- r
- o
- v
- e
- m
- e
- n
- t
- .
- Building precedent for climate-change EPIL; expanding into biodiversity and marine domains; continued involvement in environmental legislation; capacity-building for other NGOs (study camps).
A second look
The plus is cleaning polluted soil/water/air and conserving endangered species and ecosystems (Nature, People, future generations), backed by the international recognition of the green peafowl case, the legislation of the polluter-pays principle, and independents like Sixth Tone, academia and the World Conference on Environmental Justice. Caveats: it operates under China's NGO/judicial constraints (only about 20% can register, administrative EPIL against government bodies is not allowed, judgment enforcement tends to lag, and the Changzhou case was effectively a draw), so a win does not always translate into swift on-the-ground improvement.
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the story an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q3 | Back to top