B
NARRATIVE VALUE
Certainty
●●○ medium
ABCDEFG
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
As of: 2026-Q4Status: ActiveCeiling reason: No confirmed −
History2026-Q4BHistory grows each quarter
Femili PNG: Running the paperwork for the person who fled the violence. The letter is B; certainty is medium. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q4; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
Someone fleeing family or sexual violence in Papua New Guinea has to go round a series of counters themselves - hospital, police, court, somewhere safe. Injured, without money, with someone still looking for them, those steps are hard to take.
Femili PNG, opened in 2014, is a local NGO that takes on that running as "case management". A caseworker stays with one survivor and connects medical care, legal process, safe accommodation and immediate living costs through a single door. It has centres in Lae, Goroka and Port Moresby, and in Port Moresby runs the Bel isi case management centre and safe house. A supporting organization records that it has helped more than 6,100 clients since opening. In July 2026 ExxonMobil PNG donated laptops for caseworkers to manage cases. Its board includes Australia's Domestic Violence Commissioner and a researcher from the Australian National University.
One person’s story (N1)
+ A single story
Anyone who comes to the organization is assigned a caseworker, and that caseworker goes round with them - to the hospital, the police, the court, the place of safety. In Port Moresby it runs the Bel isi case management centre and safe house, with further centres in Lae and Goroka. Opened in 2014 as a Papua New Guinean NGO, it is recorded as having helped more than 6,100 people in total. Its board includes Australia's Domestic Violence Commissioner and a researcher from the Australian National University, bringing outside oversight. Nature of sources: programme-official plus records of a supporting organization.
Source nature: Femili PNG / FemiliPNG Australia / T2 programme-official. Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- The positive side of this assessment rests on the single story (N1) above and its source. A per-item ledger of positive effects has not yet been compiled for this organization.T2 programme-official
Watching (unconfirmed; not counted in the assessment)- Undated cumulative figures
- reach limited to three cities
- follow-up on safety after support ends
Looking ahead (not included in the assessment)- Continuing case management and shelter operations and widening the areas covered.
A second look
The cumulative figure of more than 6,100 clients comes from a supporting organization and carries no stated year. No independent material showing recent annual caseloads could be found. With centres in only three cities, survivors in rural areas are hard to reach. Shelter capacity, and following up on safety after support ends, are also issues.
Sources
+N1Femili PNG / FemiliPNG Australia｜2026｜🔗
How to read this assessment
A Independently verified +, with no confirmed −
B Leans +, with independent backing
C Mixed. A confirmed − sets the ceiling, or much is unverified
D A serious confirmed − sets the ceiling
E A serious − reaches the core of the organization
F Serious and systemic, with little redeeming +
G Only extreme cases
Out of scope An entity whose core purpose is illegal
On hold Independent evidence is scarce on both + and −
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the narrative an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q4 | Back to top