Generations For Peace (GFP) is an Amman-based peacebuilding NGO launched in 2007 by Jordan's HRH Prince Feisal Al Hussein as the Jordan Olympic Committee's sport-for-peace initiative. It is recognized by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Using sport as an entry point (later adding art, advocacy, dialogue, empowerment and media), GFP engages children, youth and adults in areas experiencing conflict and violence, aiming at sustained grassroots conflict transformation. At its core is a volunteer movement—it develops local 'youth leaders' who run ongoing peace programs in their own communities. Over these 18 years it has trained over 10,000 volunteer leaders in over 50 countries across the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Europe, and engaged over 1 million people. The GFP Institute partners with Georgetown and Oxford Universities to verify outcomes like reduced violence and building trust between different groups.
●●○ medium
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
Generations For Peace: Crossing divides through sport and dialogue. The letter is B; certainty is medium. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q3; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ A single story
In conflict-affected areas, different groups often reject one another. Using sport and dialogue as an entry point, GFP develops such areas' youth as 'leaders.' Young people in Jordan and refugee camps (Zaatari/Azraq) move from mutual distrust and violence toward respect, tolerance and trust for others, becoming those who run community peace programs themselves. The organization records women's sport in Karak and stories of individual transformation through sport.
Source nature: Peace Insight／Generations For Peace / P1 First-party / independent (third-party). Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- Founded in 2007 by HRH Prince Feisal Al Hussein as the Olympic Committee's sport-for-peace initiative (Amman), IOC-recognized. Using sport/art/dialogue as an entry point, it develops youth leaders in conflict-affected areas to carry out grassroots conflict transformation. It has trained over 10,000 leaders in 50–52 countries, reaching over 1 million.P2 Independent (encyclopedia) / Wikipedia(Generations For Peace)
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- P
- e
- a
- c
- e
- b
- u
- i
- l
- d
- i
- n
- g
- o
- u
- t
- c
- o
- m
- e
- s
- (
- a
- t
- t
- i
- t
- u
- d
- e
- /
- b
- e
- h
- a
- v
- i
- o
- r
- c
- h
- a
- n
- g
- e
- ,
- t
- r
- u
- s
- t
- )
- a
- r
- e
- i
- n
- h
- e
- r
- e
- n
- t
- l
- y
- h
- a
- r
- d
- t
- o
- q
- u
- a
- n
- t
- i
- f
- y
- ,
- a
- n
- d
- r
- e
- a
- c
- h
- f
- i
- g
- u
- r
- e
- s
- a
- r
- e
- p
- a
- r
- t
- l
- y
- s
- e
- l
- f
- -
- r
- e
- p
- o
- r
- t
- e
- d
- ;
- i
- t
- i
- s
- a
- n
- o
- r
- g
- a
- n
- i
- z
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- f
- o
- u
- n
- d
- e
- d
- b
- y
- t
- h
- e
- r
- o
- y
- a
- l
- f
- a
- m
- i
- l
- y
- /
- e
- s
- t
- a
- b
- l
- i
- s
- h
- m
- e
- n
- t
- .
- More rigorous independent verification of peacebuilding outcomes; sustaining the volunteer-leader model; reaching the most vulnerable (women, refugees); ensuring political neutrality; long-term effect in conflict-recurrence areas.
A second look
The plus is an effect on conflict-affected children, youth and adults (People)—reduced violence, trust and tolerance across divides (tribal/ethnic/religious/gender), youth leadership and women's empowerment—with results in 50+ countries, research partnerships with Georgetown/Oxford, IOC recognition, and a ranking as the world's third peacebuilding SGO. Caveats: peacebuilding outcomes (attitude/behavior change, 'trust') are inherently hard to quantify, reach figures are partly self-reported, and it is an organization founded by the royal family/establishment. Recognizing the sustained model of youth becoming leaders and the verification effort but noting the difficulty of measuring outcomes, B/medium.
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the narrative an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q3 | Back to top