Good360 Australia is a nonprofit that delivers companies' surplus 'new' goods—excess inventory, returns, discontinued lines—to people in need through a network of vetted charities and disadvantaged schools. In 2015, Alison Covington launched it modeled on Good360, which has over 30 years and $7bn-plus of track record in the US. While companies' new goods sit unused in bulk every year, more households are going without necessities—it bridges those two realities, upholding a 'circle of good' that reduces landfill while restoring dignity. Charities and schools choose what they need when they need it, and for every $1 donated, $20 worth of goods goes out. It distributes $60.5M worth a year, and by 2019 reached over $110M cumulatively and over 10 million items. Over 700 companies (BIG W, LEGO, L'Oréal, Harvey Norman, IKEA, etc.) donate, supporting the homeless, refugees, people with disability, Indigenous people and struggling households. It also handled disaster relief in the Black Summer bushfires and COVID, and its western Sydney warehouse doubles as a work-experience site for Work-for-the-Dole participants. It is registered with the ACNC (Australian Charities Commission), and industry media report on it continuously.
●●○ medium
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
Good360 Australia: Turning companies' surplus new goods to people in need—a 'circle of good'. The letter is B; certainty is medium. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q3; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ before → after
While more households go without necessities amid the cost-of-living crisis, companies' new goods sit unused in bulk—this is the 'before.' Through Good360, a refrigerator reached a household that had just escaped domestic violence or just come out of homelessness. One single mother of three who received one had been homeless for 12 months, but with a new fridge added to her new home it became 'the most joyful Christmas in years.' A fridge makes it possible to store fresh food and receive rescued food, improving diet and quality of life.
Source nature: P4 Company impact page (discounted). Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- Founded in 2015 (on the US Good360 model). Redistributes companies' surplus new goods to 4,000 vetted charities and disadvantaged schools. $60.5M worth a year; over $110M and 10 million items cumulatively by 2019. $1 donated → $20 in goods. Over 700 companies (BIG W/LEGO/L'Oréal/Harvey Norman/IKEA, etc.). Supports the homeless, refugees, people with disability, Indigenous people and struggling households, plus disaster response. An ACNC-registered charity.P2 Industry media / ACNC / Community Directors / ACNC
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- S
- t
- r
- u
- c
- t
- u
- r
- a
- l
- d
- e
- p
- e
- n
- d
- e
- n
- c
- e
- o
- n
- c
- o
- r
- p
- o
- r
- a
- t
- e
- s
- u
- r
- p
- l
- u
- s
- (
- n
- o
- t
- c
- o
- r
- r
- e
- c
- t
- i
- n
- g
- o
- v
- e
- r
- p
- r
- o
- d
- u
- c
- t
- i
- o
- n
- )
- ;
- i
- n
- d
- e
- p
- e
- n
- d
- e
- n
- t
- v
- e
- r
- i
- f
- i
- c
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- f
- b
- e
- n
- e
- f
- i
- c
- i
- a
- r
- y
- t
- e
- s
- t
- i
- m
- o
- n
- y
- ;
- m
- e
- m
- b
- e
- r
- s
- h
- i
- p
- /
- f
- e
- e
- b
- a
- r
- r
- i
- e
- r
- s
- ;
- s
- o
- m
- e
- d
- i
- s
- t
- r
- i
- b
- u
- t
- i
- o
- n
- f
- i
- g
- u
- r
- e
- s
- s
- e
- l
- f
- -
- t
- a
- l
- l
- i
- e
- d
- .
- Expanding goods distribution toward 2030 (still tiny relative to market size); Community Hubs in each state with IKEA and others; raising awareness ('many companies don't know it exists').
A second look
The plus is restoring necessities and dignity for struggling households, the homeless, refugees, people with disability and Indigenous people (People) plus diverting surplus new goods from landfill (Nature), backed by ACNC registration, concrete dollar figures and continuous industry reporting. Caveats: much beneficiary testimony comes from the company's own impact page (discounted) and individual independent verification is limited; it structurally depends on companies' overproduction and surplus (treating the symptom, not correcting consumption itself); and a $250 membership fee and other fees can be an access barrier.
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the story an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q3 | Back to top