Aurora Social Enterprise (GreenBio), on the belief that 'Indigenous success is our success,' is a social enterprise connecting the Indigenous villages of Taiwan's Alishan with urban markets. It was the first in Taiwan to put 'social enterprise' in its company name. Its origins trace to an Indigenous project at Fu Jen Catholic University led by the India-born priest Zheng Mu-xi. Seeing the root of the villages' problems in the lack of work, they launched the NPO 'Mana Organic Culture and Life Promotion Association' in 2005 and taught the Tsou farmers of Alishan organic methods that turn food waste into organic fertilizer and restore the land's vitality. But small-scale highland farming faces high freight costs and a weak market position. So in 2008, four people—Chen Ya-zhen, Wang Peng-chao, Li Zhi-qiang and Lu Pei-juan—founded Aurora Social Enterprise. Mana handles producer education and Aurora handles 'guaranteed-price purchasing (for the first two years, buying the entire crop at a set price regardless of quality or season)' and sales channels, sharing the risk of switching crops with the farmers. From 2008 to 2021 it produced about 2.2 million kg of organic produce, brought a total of about NT$89.06 million in income to 114 farmers, and grew organic planting area beyond 400 hectares.
●●○ medium
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
Aurora Social Enterprise (GreenBio): Indigenous success is our success—Alishan's organic villages. The letter is B; certainty is medium. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q2; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ before → after
Once, in Alishan's villages, every young person carrying a household's livelihood left for the city in search of wage work, and only women, children and elders remained where education happened. When Aurora and Mana built a production-and-sales system for organic farming, pesticide-free fields spread, and children could once again chase insects in the paddies without fear of pesticides. Co-founder Li Zhi-qiang says the village's young people now stay in their hometown.
Source nature: P2 Independent media (reporting). Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- Aurora and Mana's organic production-and-sales model became the subject of academic case studies analyzing its social and economic benefits for Indigenous villages. Through guaranteed-price purchasing, from 2008 to 2021 it brought a total of about NT$89.06 million in income to 114 farmers, and organic planting area exceeded 400 hectares. From 2009 to 2011 total output grew 35.6%.P1 Academic research / public record
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- T
- h
- e
- s
- h
- r
- i
- n
- k
- i
- n
- g
- o
- f
- A
- u
- r
- o
- r
- a
- '
- s
- o
- w
- n
- r
- o
- l
- e
- a
- s
- t
- h
- e
- b
- u
- s
- i
- n
- e
- s
- s
- t
- r
- a
- n
- s
- f
- e
- r
- s
- t
- o
- l
- o
- c
- a
- l
- c
- o
- o
- p
- e
- r
- a
- t
- i
- v
- e
- s
- (
- w
- a
- t
- c
- h
- i
- n
- g
- w
- h
- e
- t
- h
- e
- r
- b
- e
- n
- e
- f
- i
- t
- s
- p
- e
- r
- s
- i
- s
- t
- i
- n
- t
- h
- e
- s
- u
- c
- c
- e
- s
- s
- o
- r
- o
- r
- g
- a
- n
- i
- z
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- s
- ;
- t
- h
- i
- s
- i
- s
- n
- o
- t
- b
- u
- s
- i
- n
- e
- s
- s
- e
- x
- t
- i
- n
- c
- t
- i
- o
- n
- )
- .
- Replicating the successful model in the Philippines and elsewhere (cacao cooperatives); supporting urban Indigenous entrepreneurship; developing youth.
A second look
The core plus is improving Indigenous farmers' livelihoods, employment and cultural continuity, and restoring the land through pesticide-free organic farming (People, Nature), independently backed by academic case studies (on Aurora and Mana) and major media (Business Today, Social Enterprise Insights). On the other hand, in recent years it has been transferring the business to local cooperatives, and the shrinking of Aurora's own role and whether the benefits persist in the successor organizations are watch points (succession, not business extinction).
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the story an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q2 | Back to top