Method is a design-led eco-cleaning pioneer started in 2000 in San Francisco by Eric Ryan and Adam Lowry (holding company People Against Dirty). With plant-based, biodegradable ingredients and bottles you'd want to leave out, it showed that 'eco products need not sacrifice performance or design,' and moved into circularity, such as bottles made from ocean-bound plastic. It keeps Leaping Bunny (no animal testing) and Cradle to Cradle certification. In 2017, SC Johnson acquired Method along with sister brand Ecover. Afterward, Method itself announced a decision 'not to recertify as a B Corp,' and its B Corp certification lapsed. Parent SC Johnson is said to conduct animal testing where required by regulation, and Ethical Consumer lowers Ecover/Method's score on a group basis. In 2020, the U.S. National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Method discontinue 'non-toxic' claims on some products for lack of sufficient scientific support.
●○○ low
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
Method Products, PBC: A design-and-plant-based pioneer that changed cleaning (but its B Corp lapsed). The letter is B; certainty is low. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q2; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ before → after
Plastic thrown away with every clean, flowing into the sea. Method has made bottles from ocean-bound plastic (recycled HDPE) recovered from waterways and, with plant-based, biodegradable ingredients, shown that 'eco need not compromise performance and design.' Even after the acquisition it keeps Cradle to Cradle and Leaping Bunny (no animal testing). But it let B Corp lapse without recertifying, so the independent corroboration is weaker than before (nature of the source: company disclosure + independent review).
Source nature: Method / NonToxicLab / P4 Company disclosure / independent review. Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- Even after the SC Johnson acquisition, it maintains Cradle to Cradle and Leaping Bunny (no animal testing) certification. Ingredient transparency is higher than a typical brand. On the other hand, it also uses sensitizing ingredients such as fragrances, so labels require careful interpretation.P4 Certification (Cradle to Cradle / Leaping Bunny) / Cradle to Cradle / Leaping Bunny / NonToxicLab
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- L
- e
- t
- B
- C
- o
- r
- p
- l
- a
- p
- s
- e
- w
- i
- t
- h
- o
- u
- t
- r
- e
- c
- e
- r
- t
- i
- f
- y
- i
- n
- g
- ;
- t
- h
- e
- 2
- 0
- 2
- 0
- N
- A
- D
- r
- e
- c
- o
- m
- m
- e
- n
- d
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- v
- e
- r
- i
- n
- s
- u
- f
- f
- i
- c
- i
- e
- n
- t
- b
- a
- s
- i
- s
- f
- o
- r
- '
- n
- o
- n
- -
- t
- o
- x
- i
- c
- '
- c
- l
- a
- i
- m
- s
- (
- n
- a
- r
- r
- a
- t
- i
- v
- e
- i
- n
- t
- e
- g
- r
- i
- t
- y
- )
- ;
- p
- a
- r
- e
- n
- t
- S
- C
- J
- o
- h
- n
- s
- o
- n
- '
- s
- a
- n
- i
- m
- a
- l
- t
- e
- s
- t
- i
- n
- g
- (
- w
- h
- e
- r
- e
- r
- e
- q
- u
- i
- r
- e
- d
- b
- y
- r
- e
- g
- u
- l
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- )
- .
- Product improvement using the parent's resources; expanding ocean-plastic and PCR packaging (restoring independent verification is the challenge).
A second look
The core plus is its history as an eco-cleaning pioneer and its existing independent certifications, Cradle to Cradle and Leaping Bunny (Nature, Animals). But because it let the key B Corp certification lapse without recertifying, independent verification of the plus is weakened, and certainty is low. There is no confirmed minus (direct harm to those protected), but (i) parent SC Johnson's animal testing and (ii) the NAD recommendation over insufficient basis for 'non-toxic' claims (an issue of narrative integrity) are factors for watch and lower certainty.
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the story an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q2 | Back to top