AI-generated working estimate based on public information / opinion & commentary, not a statement of fact / corrections & rebuttals welcome

日本語 / English

Home / East & Southeast Asia · Japan / NPO (food & nutrition) · Private

TABLE FOR TWO International

“Another shared table” solving obesity in rich countries and hunger in poor ones at once

B
NARRATIVE VALUE
Certainty
●●○ medium
ABCDEFG

There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter

As of: 2026-Q2Status: ActiveCeiling reason: No confirmed −
History2026-Q2BHistory grows each quarter

TABLE FOR TWO International: “Another shared table” solving obesity in rich countries and hunger in poor ones at once. Masahisa Kogure, who had worked at McKinsey and Shochiku, kept holding a wish to “be of use to someone.” Hearing from a senior about the imbalance of food — “about 800 million people in the world go hungry, while about 2 billion are obese” — he thought he could help through “food,” familiar to everyone, and launched the NPO TABLE FOR TWO in 2007. The mechanism is simple. At company cafeterias and shops in developed countries, when you buy a calorie-conscious healthy menu with ¥20 added, that ¥20 becomes one school meal in a developing country. At one table, an adult in a rich country and a child in a poor country “share a meal.” Participation has spread to about 650 companies and organizations, delivering a cumulative total of over 50 million school meals. The letter is B; certainty is medium. (As of 2026-Q2; estimate based on public information.)

Main narrative

Masahisa Kogure, who had worked at McKinsey and Shochiku, kept holding a wish to “be of use to someone.” Hearing from a senior about the imbalance of food — “about 800 million people in the world go hungry, while about 2 billion are obese” — he thought he could help through “food,” familiar to everyone, and launched the NPO TABLE FOR TWO in 2007.

The mechanism is simple. At company cafeterias and shops in developed countries, when you buy a calorie-conscious healthy menu with ¥20 added, that ¥20 becomes one school meal in a developing country. At one table, an adult in a rich country and a child in a poor country “share a meal.” Participation has spread to about 650 companies and organizations, delivering a cumulative total of over 50 million school meals.

One person’s story (N1)

+ before → after

Warm school meals using locally grown ingredients arrive at elementary schools in Rwanda and Uganda. When the meals begin, enrollment and attendance jump from 50–60% to nearly 100% — because hunger is satisfied and children can come to school and learn. The “surplus calories” of rich countries turn into a meal for a child in a poor country.

Source nature: BRUTUS / P2 major media. Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.

Positive / negative effects

+ effects

  • Received the Award of the Deputy Director-General for SDGs Promotion (Minister for Foreign Affairs) at the 3rd Japan SDGs Awards.P1 cert/award/academic/international body / 外務省(SDGs推進本部)

− effects (confirmed)

  • No confirmed −.
Watching (unconfirmed; not counted in the assessment)

Nothing of note at present.

A second look

To what extent the improvement in schooling and nutrition from donations can be independently verified through local follow-up.

Sources

+N1BRUTUS|8億人の飢餓と20億人の肥満を同時に解消する|2024|https://brutus.jp/table_for_two/
+ effect外務省(SDGs推進本部)|第3回ジャパンSDGsアワード|2019|Source URL to be confirmed

How to read this assessment

A Independently verified +, with no confirmed −
B Leans +, with independent backing
C Mixed. A confirmed − sets the ceiling, or much is unverified
D A serious confirmed − sets the ceiling
E A serious − reaches the core of the organization
F Serious and systemic, with little redeeming +
G Only extreme cases
Out of scope An entity whose core purpose is illegal
On hold Independent evidence is scarce on both + and −
  • Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
  • The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
  • Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
  • The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.

This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.

Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the story an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q2 | Back to top