The Humane League (THL) is an organization for farm animals born in the US in 2005. Its target is the hen—about 90% of land-farmed animals—many confined in battery cages the size of an iPad, unable to spread their wings or nest, suffering. THL presses giant food companies through both dialogue and public pressure to pledge cage-free for laying hens and the Better Chicken Commitment for broilers, then tracks 'whether the pledge is kept' to prevent backsliding. It has drawn out over 3,000 corporate pledges cumulatively (McDonald's, Walmart, Starbucks, PepsiCo, Nestlé…), and 92% of pledges due by 2024 were fulfilled. The US cage-free rate for laying hens rose from 5% in 2015, when THL began the movement, to 40–50% in 2025—that 40% difference means over 100 million hens a year spared a life in a cage. It advances the global movement through the Open Wing Alliance (95 groups in 75 countries) and US legislation through the Animal Policy Alliance.
●●● high
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
The Humane League: Moving giant corporations for one hen in a cage. The letter is B; certainty is high. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q3; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ A single story
Battery-cage laying hens are confined to a space about the size of an iPad, unable to perform basic behaviors like spreading their wings, perching or laying in a nest, and many break bones from osteoporosis (battery cages are said to be about 60% of a hen's suffering). Through cage-free pledges THL draws out of companies, those hens can walk, spread their wings and lay in nests in cage-free aviaries. In the US, from 5% in 2015 to 40-50% in 2025, over 100 million hens a year are spared a life in a cage.
Source nature: every.org／FarmKind / P2 Independent (third-party / evaluator). Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- See the N1 above for the main positive story; independently verified + will be added over time.
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
- A
- s
- a
- d
- v
- o
- c
- a
- c
- y
- t
- h
- e
- e
- f
- f
- e
- c
- t
- i
- s
- i
- n
- d
- i
- r
- e
- c
- t
- ,
- w
- i
- t
- h
- a
- c
- o
- u
- n
- t
- e
- r
- f
- a
- c
- t
- u
- a
- l
- d
- e
- b
- a
- t
- e
- (
- c
- o
- m
- p
- a
- n
- i
- e
- s
- m
- i
- g
- h
- t
- h
- a
- v
- e
- t
- r
- a
- n
- s
- i
- t
- i
- o
- n
- e
- d
- a
- n
- y
- w
- a
- y
- )
- ;
- c
- a
- g
- e
- -
- f
- r
- e
- e
- i
- s
- n
- o
- t
- f
- u
- l
- l
- h
- i
- g
- h
- w
- e
- l
- f
- a
- r
- e
- (
- d
- e
- b
- e
- a
- k
- i
- n
- g
- ,
- m
- a
- l
- e
- -
- c
- h
- i
- c
- k
- c
- u
- l
- l
- i
- n
- g
- ,
- e
- a
- r
- l
- y
- -
- t
- r
- a
- n
- s
- i
- t
- i
- o
- n
- m
- o
- r
- t
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- ,
- e
- t
- c
- .
- )
- .
- Embedding cage-free in emerging markets; further securing pledge fulfillment rates; welfare improvement for broilers (fast-growth breeds); high-welfare 'beyond cage-free'; permanence through legislation.
A second look
The plus is a structural effect on farmed hens (Animals)—liberation from cages—and it is one of the strongest-evidenced organizations in animal welfare, rated top every year since 2013 by Animal Charity Evaluators, backed by cost-effectiveness of about 11 hens/dollar (cage-free) and measured change like the US cage-free rate going 5→40-50% and 92% pledge fulfillment. Caveats: as advocacy the effect is indirect, with a counterfactual debate that companies 'would have transitioned eventually,' and cage-free itself is not full high welfare (debeaking, culling of male chicks, elevated mortality early in the transition, etc.). Weighing the strong evidence and large-scale measured change, B/high.
Sources
How to read this assessment
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the narrative an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q3 | Back to top