Vestas is the world's largest wind-turbine maker, based in Denmark. By the end of 2025 its installed capacity worldwide reached 201 GW, and the turbines it has delivered have avoided over 1.9 billion tonnes of CO2. As of end-2024 its installed base had the capacity to avoid 239 million tonnes of GHGs a year. It has cut its own Scope 1 & 2 by 42% versus 2019, targets carbon neutrality without offsets by 2030 and zero-waste turbines by 2040. On the long-standing challenge of blade recycling, a new chemical process that breaks down epoxy resin opens a path to recycle even blades already in operation.
B
NARRATIVE VALUE
Certainty
●●● high
●●● high
ABCDEFG
There is no confirmed −; independently verified + decide the position (B). No unreachable strike-through.= non-additive meter
As of: 2026-Q3Status: ActiveCeiling reason: No confirmed −
History2026-Q3BHistory grows each quarter
Vestas: Wind power that has already avoided 1.9 billion tonnes of CO2. The letter is B; certainty is high. Unconfirmed concerns are placed under “Watching.” (As of 2026-Q3; estimate based on public information.)
Main narrative
One person’s story (N1)
+ A single story
Electricity that has relied on fossil-fuel generation. Vestas's wind turbines replace it with the power of wind. The benefit appears for nature and future generations: by the end of 2025 its installed capacity worldwide reached 201 GW, and the turbines it has delivered have avoided over 1.9 billion tonnes of CO2.
Source nature: Vestas / P1 First-party / independent. Positive effects are not used to offset negatives.
Positive / negative effects
+ effects
- It cut its own Scope 1 & 2 by 42% versus 2019, and a new process that breaks down epoxy resin opens a path to recycle even blades already in operation.P1 First-party / independent (reporting) / Vestas / GreentechLead
− effects (confirmed)
- No confirmed −.
Watching (unconfirmed; not counted in the assessment)
- A listed, for-profit maker
- the generation plus depends on operators' adoption and siting (indirect)
- the challenge of retired-blade waste (now being addressed).
Looking ahead (not included in the assessment)
- Expanding installed capacity; commercializing and spreading blade recycling; zero waste (2040) and carbon neutrality (2030); care for siting's environment.
A second look
The plus is fossil-replacing generation through wind power, an effect on nature and future generations, backed by 201 GW, 1.9 billion tonnes of CO2 avoided and a 239-million-tonne annual avoidance capacity. But it is a listed, for-profit maker, the generation plus depends on operators' adoption and siting, and blade waste remains a challenge (now being addressed). Weighing the genuine, large-scale decarbonization plus, B/high.
Sources
+N1Vestas｜200 GW installed milestone｜2025｜🔗
+ effectVestas / GreentechLead｜Annual Report 2025 / 42% emissions cut｜2025｜🔗
How to read this assessment
A Independently verified +, with no confirmed −
B Leans +, with independent backing
C Mixed. A confirmed − sets the ceiling, or much is unverified
D A serious confirmed − sets the ceiling
E A serious − reaches the core of the organization
F Serious and systemic, with little redeeming +
G Only extreme cases
Out of scope An entity whose core purpose is illegal
On hold Independent evidence is scarce on both + and −
- Reachable upper bound (ceiling): a confirmed − sets the ceiling, and independently verified + decide the position within it. + do not cancel out −.
- The weight of evidence is not symmetric: only confirmed − are counted; the volume of disputes or allegations goes under “Watching.” + are counted from independent evidence, while an organization’s own PR is treated as “reference.”
- Size is not value: scale is not used in the assessment. Matters that stay within money or competition—investors, shareholders, sanctions, trade secrets—are also excluded.
- The letter (assessment) and certainty (how reliable the information is) are separate axes.
This is a translation; the Japanese version is authoritative. The assessments here are generated automatically by AI based on published criteria. The operator does not alter individual results. Because they are AI-generated they may contain errors, and they are opinion and commentary, not statements of fact. Where evidence is insufficient, the entry is marked “On hold.” Requests for correction are accepted via the form.
Terms: Narrative Value = an assessment (A–G) of the distance between the narrative an organization tells and its reality / Ceiling meter = a visualization of the reachable upper bound / Watching = unconfirmed matters not counted / Protected stakeholders = people, animals, nature, and future generations. | Generated by: AI | As of: 2026-Q3 | Back to top